![]() Also, OS9 is a lot more customizable than X. There was nothing wrong with OS9 except maybe not really multitasking, crashed more often than x(not much though), and was a product of how much you put into customizing it. In all honesty, the updates to those cost a lot of money which I dont have. The truth is, I use almost all of those in Classic since I don't use them enought to justify a humogous gain in speed. Today I care about OSX the same you care about the next cover picture of the TV guide. I rather wait for you to experience and complain with OSX so I can make the jump in the future, may be in a year from now in a more open and mature platform. I just do not feel in the mood to transfer all my data to OSX, specially when I'm gonna face the frustartion of not having as many options in the already small Mac software world. OSX should incorporate the flexibility of OS 9, pherhaps in the future I would be able to find some share ware aplications that allows me to do that kind of things. I like to have an alias of one of my partitions in the Apple Menu Items and check the content from there, in OSX I can not do that, I'm not that free in OSX as I would like to. The interface should be personalized and OSX is not that. ![]() I just do not want to have every aplication on the dock, that is like an enhace control strip. ![]() I understand OSX is very good and simpler in most of the stuff but I can't stand not having a calculator or an Apple Menu Itimes that I can configurate as I please. There is not Digital Performer or VJ's software compatibles with OSX. I can deal with 9 back and foward better tha OSX. in everythingĩ9.9 percent of the software I use is in 9. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |